A few days ago a tragic report came out stating that around a billion people in this world do not have enough to eat. The food crisis will worsen because of the fast rising prices, not to mention the impact of the financial crisis. The difference between the levels of poverty are drastic among different countries and within each country itself. Unfortunately, the concept of poverty in Western societies is seen very limited. “This limited view on its own national borders, frees one from looking at the misery of the world”, writes Ulrich Beck.
The limited materialistic view
The limited view of poverty can be seen particularly in western Europe, where the media tends to focus its discussions in most cases solely around materialistic issues. Basically, anyone who earns less of half the average income is considered poor. The discussion often stops there, instead of taking factors such as environment, health and education into consideration. Lately, there was even a proposal going on in Germany about whether people could live with about 100 Euro a month. Do not get me wrong, I am aware of how important a welfare state is, but poverty cannot be tackled alone by monetary redistribution. Amartya Sen, an Indian economist and Nobel prizewinner, stresses that the importance of a more holistic view on poverty is necessary, which at the same time stresses the need of equality and freedom:
The poor generally lack a number of elements, such as education, access to land, health and longevity, justice, family and community support, credit and other productive resources, a voice in institutions, and access to opportunity. According to Sen, being poor does not mean living below an imaginary poverty line, such as an income of two dollars a day or less. It means having an income level that does not allow an individual to cover certain basic necessities, taking into account the circumstances and social requirements of the environment. Furthermore, many of the factors are interconnected. (GlobalPolicy)
Social equality – it is not north vs. south but all around the world
Coming back to Ulrich Beck, he argues in his article that (1) social justice becomes a worldwide phenomena and (2) that we cannot address social injustice within a country alone. In the old days there was an imaginary border between the poor in the north and the south, but, nowadays, social equality is becoming universal as particularly western countries put it on their flags. And he adds: Many immigrants take the right for social equality and mobility for granted, but for most western countries this equality stops at their borders. These were some random thoughts for the blog action day on poverty.
No related posts.
This blog explores worldwide social innovations and how people benefit from infor- mation and communication technologies. 
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
Great post, Thank you for sharing, I myself wrote about it here: http://www.guruofsales.com/general/427/fight-poverty-its-blog-action-day-today and got a huge respond from readers and other bloggers. Would you please honor us and share your thoughts by leaving a comment on our post? I am trying to come up with something new tomorrow and I will include and encourage readers to visit your blog back so we can all unite to fight poverty.
Great post! Its so true that in most developed nations our vision of poor is severely limited.
I just read in the ODE Magazine BAD08 post
“It’s commonly assumed that the opposite of poor is rich, but actually it’s sufficiency—a sense that there is enough.”
I think that by the time poverty has become endemic in any place, the answer to it is no longer just money. Sure, money helps, but its access to resources, to education, to opportunities that help the poor reach sufficiency!
interesting post. indeed. different countries associated different images and standards with poverty. really, we should all just do what we can.
for my part, i turn to sites like freerice (rice donation), kiva (microfinance), and goodsearch (donation per search), as ways to help alleviate poverty online. i also put up their banners on my blog.
saw this post via the blog action day site. it’s great that you’re participating.
Very good post. I think poverty in western countries today is very different to poverty 100 years ago – but our governments still view it as the same. Most western countries have addressed the physical aspects of poverty (even though it’s often not very effective). Starvation, disease, unclean water, and lack of access to education do not exist nearly on the same scale as a century ago. But now problems are more psychological. People are often born into welfare, do not want to pursue education, do not want to work, and heavily abuse substances. Lack of ambition, self-worth, and general happiness are endemic. I think it is crucial to place more emphasis on the mental and psychological causes of poverty, and provide more funding accordingly.