Exploring the potentials of blogging for development

Jul / 14 / 2009

In the recent edition of the “Participatory Learning and Action” magazine titled “Change at hand: Web 2.0 for development”, I wrote an article about blogging and whether writing blog posts could make a difference in the development work. In this times of breathtaking web changes, blogging seems already outdated, therefore, in my article I argue that blogging can enhance transparency, support the process for openness and be the key for sustainable network building and quality discourse.

Extract

Accountability and transparency
Compared to normal development websites, bloggers both analyse and link information – and in the process, create meaning. Bloggers are also notified (‘pinged’) every time there is a new link from another blog to their own posts. It generates interaction between bloggers and also measures the popularity of a blog – e.g. citations and affiliation (i.e. a list of links to other blogs). Bloggers weave a web of knowledge, expertise and perspectives. In a way, blogging means linking conversations and other existing blogs, increasing the ebb and flow of information. This forms hubs or nodes within networks, where bloggers aggregate information, and give orientation and relevance – and also become effective filters of information. They act like fishers, who pick the most relevant pieces of information out of the net. This aggregation is important to find different blog posts with different perspectives. The advantage of filtering is that these bloggers give an overview on interesting topics.

The disadvantage is that a blogger decides that on a personal basis and it might be biased information. Critics such as Andrew Keen wonder where the added value of this growing content lies – compared to professionally compiled information by journalists. Many say that most blogs ‘copy and paste’ from other blogs or repeat themselves, often ending in an echo chamber of mutual confirmation. Networks of sympathising blogs often do develop where not enough perspectives are heard or discussed.

However, blogging proponents underline the strength to link information from different connections, disciplines and interests and highlight the possibility for direct feedback. The paradigm shift is that each Internet user is able to link information and can add values and perspectives – Wikipedia and worldchanging.com are good examples. These networks of blogs and their readers become a large conversation, where everyone can participate. New ideas and interpretations of them find their way to different blogs every day. Much of this kind of exchange was already happening through email mailing lists. However, these connections made by blogging are accessible to anyone online: they are not limited to a certain thematic mailing list and so are more transparent.

Examples in development
For development, this linking and exchanging becomes essential. Multidisciplinary approaches are key to tackling complex environmental problems. Blogs have opened up new channels for development communication.

One example is the UK Guardian newspaper’s ongoing Katine project in Uganda.  Villagers, journalists, scientists and aid workers are invited to write openly their perspectives about the project on a blog on the newspaper’s website. It entails controversial discussions around development aid, but also shows the complexity of community-driven development projects. For example, on the Katine blog, Richard M. Kavuma writes bluntly, “The trouble is, the need is much greater than the project budget.” This is a direct comment about the limitations of development aid. Blogging can allow us to be transparent about projects. It gives more space for opinions, different perspectives and reflections than traditional communication channels. These can help influence the course of a project. But here, the limits of blogging also appear: one blogger made the comment that, “At its best, the Guardian’s reporting allows us to analyse and think about life in Katine in a careful way.” Just blogging does not necessarily have a demonstrable impact on development.

For many organisations, blogging offers the chance to enter into an ‘authentic two-way conversation’, enabling people to provide feedback in an open manner – and more easily than before. This bottom-up approach to speaking out about social, economical or political issues has the potential to engage a broader public sphere in the development sector. But it seems only a few organisations in the development field have discovered the potential of blogging – and not all appreciate this degree of openness.

Unfortunately, many of the existing initiatives are often only randomly linked – they are islands rather than networks. Yet Allison Fine (2006) argues that future organisations have to embrace this kind of openness and learn to improve their listening skills. For development organisations, which are non-profit and publicly-funded, there is a chance to improve transparency. Although there are examples of increasing political influence of blogs, particularly in the USA, the political blogosphere in most countries is still marginal. The communication power of blogs has not yet challenged development organisations – but they can act as watchdogs. As Daniel Kaufmann, Director of the World Bank Institute writes on his blog,

“Blogs are playing an increasingly important role for improved governance. Blogs do not face the restraints of commercial print media. The blogosphere is a planet apart from traditional PR departments of public institutions, enabling citizens to share unfiltered information, expose misdeeds, and freely express views. Blogs help make governments and public institutions more accountable.”

Some challenges to be aware of
Since the creation of the first blog, we have witnessed a huge boom. But not all blogs become vibrant spaces for discussion. Many blogs quickly lapse or are rarely updated. Finding an audience is usually a major challenge. Many also underestimate how much time and resources a blog needs. It takes skill and patience to achieve a vibrant blog with an active, commenting audience. Attention and visitors are not guaranteed. You need to persevere to find the audience or help the audience find you.

Issues of access and literacy
For the average, experienced Internet user, you can quickly learn the publishing process for a blog post. It should not take more than three mouse-clicks, including writing the text. But not everybody is as well connected or has the experience to use this tool and its opportunities. The participatory web has opened new ways of interacting on the Internet, but there are obstacles: access, cost, time, literacy and a certain degree of media literacy. Particularly in developing countries, few people have Internet access or the means (literacy and media competence) to engage in such a conversation. Also, just a few languages dominate and there are very few bridges between them. The majority of online development debates are in English and exclude many groups from participating. Some of these obstacles will remain or might even intensify.

The speed at which innovation is transforming how we use the Internet is breathtaking. Even so, bandwidth is a big constraint. One approach to bridging the online and offline world is social reporting, where knowledge-sharing is documented for the Internet and vice versa. Participants at events act as reporters to present the different opinions and perspectives articulated within a group. The results can be texts, videos or audio presented on a website.16 Reading blogs also means that the reader has to find content and then also filter it to create their own understanding. It takes a certain level of education and familiarity with different writing styles to do this. Also less ‘media literate’ people may take blogs as factual and ‘trusted sources’ in the same way they would a newspaper. Although there are numerous cases of blogging that have helped to empower people – it does not benefit all causes. With all technology, a best fit approach is key: focus on needs. Not all communication solutions need to technological.

In the development context, the key question must always be: how can this potential tool help?
Lastly, there is also a risk that the front-runners are far ahead of normal Internet users. I share the author of We-Think Charles Leadbeater’s (2008) concern: ‘Those already rich in knowledge, information and connections may just get richer.’

Conclusion
Blogging can have a positive impact on communication and empowerment, but nevertheless there are limitations. There is still very little evidence of blogging making a difference for development. In my opinion we are still at a very early stage in this whole movement. So long as the South cannot participate more easily and until northern organisations change their mindsets towards openness, blogs and all these other wonderful Web 2.0 tools will have limited effects.

Blogging is just one form of publishing and interacting. Many Internet users are publishing content on wikis or on social networks such as Facebook, which allow their “With all technology, a best fit approach is key: focus on needs. Not all communication solutions need to technological. In the development context, the key question must always be: how can this potential tool help?” members to interact and facilitate collaboration.

Mobile social networks go in the same direction, letting you interact from your mobile phone wherever you are. Nevertheless one key problem of all these initiatives is that they always struggle to get a spill-over effect to the offline world. It is not only about publishing, but interacting within your own networks. Enthusiasts see in this open collaboration promising times ahead, where development challenges are tackled collectively. So whether you choose to use blogs or any other Web 2.0 tools – remember, it is the people who form these networks and their exchange that create value, ideas and innovation.

Download full article: Exploring the potentials of blogging for development

No related posts.

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

Christian Kreutz July 14, 2009 at 12:56 pm

Although blogging seems outdated. I tried to critically reflect on the potentials of blogging for development work. http://tr.im/sgXz

Shawn Cunningham July 14, 2009 at 2:33 pm

Dear Chris,

This is a great post. I recently started a blog on development, and I must say that I am stunned by the response in more than 1 way. Firstly, it is not so difficult to do, so the only real bottleneck is the ability to come up with sound content. And this is a real challenge sometimes, as many customers dont like it when we discuss the things we learn as facilitators contracted to them…

What I am surprised by is the response. Firstly, people phone me to comment on the site. It seems that many of the people in my target audience are still not that comfortable with sharing their views on-line. Some even fax me comments.

So perhaps we have to recognise that although there are many of us trying to create new content through our daily work experiences, our customers or counterparts are not yet always so receptive or engaged in open learning.

If you think about this then you realise why the twitter development community seems to be recycling ideas, and how the divide between those that can manage huge piles of new and apparently interesting information, and those that still mainly read from printed material is widening. I know consultants and public officials that still share 1 e-mail address between 5 people.

A last comment on your article is that good content not only comes from journalists, but also from academics. In the field of Local Economic Development, there is a total disconnect between the field of practice, and the academic sector.

Keep up the content!

Best wishes,

Shawn Cunningham

Steve Song July 14, 2009 at 3:25 pm

Great post Christian. I don’t think enough is being said about this.

Speaking for myself, starting to blog has been nothing short of transformative. The amount of digesting I have to do to produce a blog post is a lot of work but I am so much further ahead at the end than simply rushing from one project to another, which is what I used to do most of the time. It is my personal time out for reflection and learning which hopefully has some use for others too.

All the stuff we talk about in Knowledge Management, After Action Reviews, Peer Assists, etc which are great but never happen as often as they should is all made real by Web2.0. Dave Snowden is right, Web2.0 has basically leapfrogged Knowledge Management.

Now that said, I have the luxury of having blogging as part of my job description. There aren’t many who can claim that luxury. The challenge of KM 2.0 is to get development organisations to see the benefit of having all of their programme/field staff blog.

It is great to see some of the heavy hitters in development blogging. We can only hope it will become more normative behaviour. This article by Michael Nielsen, although it is about scientific publishing, highlights for me the importance of blogging in the context of development. Reinventing fewer wheels, learning more from more experiences.

The downside is that the opportunity cost for those not connected is becoming enormous as more value is generated among those who are connected.

Alanna Shaikh July 14, 2009 at 4:02 pm

The potential of blogging for development http://adjix.com/gmxi

Dawson Bridger July 14, 2009 at 5:32 pm

RT @bill_easterly @bloodandmilk: The potential of blogging for development: http://adjix.com/gmxi – big opps in terms of participation.

Development Gateway July 14, 2009 at 6:39 pm

Blogging’s not outdated, just maturing… @ckreutz Exploring the potentials of blogging for development http://tinyurl.com/ny2rjy

web2fordev July 14, 2009 at 8:04 pm

Exploring the potentials of blogging for development: 2009/07 – crisscrossed blog http://bit.ly/AOKrk

Amine July 14, 2009 at 11:08 pm

RT @DGateway Blogging not outdated, just maturing.. @ckreutz Exploring the potentials of blogging for development http://tinyurl.com/ny2rjy

Katrin Kiefer July 15, 2009 at 2:50 pm

Lesenwert: Blogpost von @ckreutz über die Potentiale des Bloggens im Bereich Entwicklungshilfe http://tr.im/sgXz

giuseppe latte July 15, 2009 at 9:49 pm

RT @ckreutz Exploring the potentials of blogging for development : crisscrossed blog
http://twurl.nl/b0loxb

Sohail Khan July 16, 2009 at 6:14 am

RT @ckreutz Exploring the potentials of blogging for development : crisscrossed blog
http://twurl.nl/b0loxb

Christian Kreutz July 20, 2009 at 11:41 am

Thanks both of you for your interesting comments. Shawn, it is amazing to hear that you received even comments by fax. Are you experience that commenters are afraid to comment online in public?

I share with you the concern that the gap between the people being able to cope and manage the information flow and those can’t, is widen. I think Steve points it out excellent: “The downside is that the opportunity cost for those not connected is becoming enormous as more value is generated among those who are connected.”

Steve, I experience the same through blogging and it is nice to read your experience. Writing is always a complex and challenging process, but it helps me to learn much better, what I actually read through the web and force me to reflect it rather than scanning it. I am little bit concerned that Twitter will replace blogging, although it can never reach the depth of blogging.
Unfortunately in most developing organizations blogging is seen through the time/cost lens. Wish we could better measure the impact of blogging.

Louche August 21, 2009 at 12:13 am

Interesting! So far, I am a pretty modest/quiet blogger. Being an undergraduate student and new to my fields of interest, I am now sure how ready I am for the type of blogging I would do in a more intense blog. However, ever since I became vegan, I have been an avid reader of high-quality blogs on veganism, which has also led me to interest in other social justice blogs and, of course, to this one. I comment on blogs all the time. Blogs have been pivotal in shaping my views on veganism and keeping all kinds of critical discussion going… a lot of bloggers I know criticize non-profit animal advocacy organizations for catering too much to tradition and for refusing criticism. I have seen intense debates involving various academics, including the most prominent theorists/authors in the field, who keep their own blogs and comment on others… It is wonderful to be able to publicly discuss the positions of the authors of one’s favorite books! I think it creates a lot of momentum.

I think it is a challenge to get the “spill-over effect” into the offline world, but I doubt I would have run a campaign on campus if it weren’t for the critical views I developed from reading blogs. These blogs create a kind of support network of ideas that may not get the average person reading, but may get the most active people discussing and collaborating. Thus, I find the discussions to be of typically higher quality than those I see on traditional journalism, if at the expense of numbers of readers. I also like the lower level of formality in a blog.

And I don’t think that, in this case, “those already rich in knowledge will get richer.” I knew absolutely nothing about veganism starting out, if that counts. But, unfortunately, I do find the offline vegan world to be generally un-networked and disinterested in reading blogs. A goal of mine will be to create and build an offline network with the help of online networking, including blogging.

Leave a Comment


Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: